Federal Contract Information, commonly referred to as FCI, pertains to data not publicly available that a contractor obtains on behalf of a US federal agency. This sensitive information is used widely throughout the government and its contractor services. It forms an invaluable part of daily operations, providing insight, guidance, and updates for federal activities.

Federal Contract Information (FCI)

Government agencies and contractors use this data to help with decision-making, planning, and the execution of various activities. From procurement to project management, from policy formulations to resource allocation, FCI is a fundamental resource. Its use extends to almost all levels of government functioning, including federal, state, and local agencies.

The CMMC certification process is arduous but our CMMC 2.0 compliance roadmap can help.

The Sensitivity of Federal Contract Information

FCI represents an extensive range of data, which includes detailed procurement strategies, precise contract agreements, specific technical specifications, advanced research data, comprehensive financial information, and crucial policy directions. The sensitivity levels of this information can differ drastically, all of which could have profoundly far-reaching implications if not handled correctly. For instance, if specific details from a defense contract were to be misused or mishandled, it could expose vulnerabilities that may gravely impact national security and jeopardize the safety of the nation.

Similarly, if financial data related to federal contracts were mishandled, it could become a gateway to massive fraud schemes, which would severely affect the economy on a larger scale and could lead to significant financial loss. Given the nature of the data and the potential severity of consequences if this data is exposed or handled incorrectly, protecting such information is of extreme importance.

The need to protect FCI stems from the potential risks that such exposure could pose to the smooth operations of government departments, as well as to the welfare and well-being of the general public. For these reasons, the security and safeguarding of FCI is non-negotiable due to the high sensitivity of this data and the possible negative consequences if this data were to fall into the wrong hands.

Federal Contract Information vs. Controlled Unclassified Information: Similarities and Differences

Federal Contract Information (FCI) is a specific category of information that is not available to the public and is provided by or produced for the US government under a contract to develop or deliver a product or service. It is important to note that FCI does not include information that is provided by the US government to the public or simple transactional information such as financial data or billing information. When dealing with FCI, contractors and subcontractors must ensure the protection of this information in accordance with federal law guidelines and contractual obligations.

Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) is a broader category of information that requires safeguarding or dissemination controls in accordance with laws, regulations, or government-wide policies. CUI covers a wide range of information types, such as personal privacy information, research data, intellectual property, law enforcement data, and more. It’s important to note that CUI is specifically identified by an authoritative source, such as a law, federal regulation, or government-wide policy.

There are several similarities between FCI and CUI, primarily that both contain sensitive information which must be protected. Both categories carry potential risks if inappropriately disclosed, leaked, or lost, including detrimental effects on national security, economy, public safety, or personal privacy. In fact, both types of information must be handled, stored, and transmitted using secure methods in line with federal requirements.

However, there are also significant differences between FCI and CUI. Firstly, the source of the information differs. FCI is information provided by or generated for the US government under a contract, while CUI is a much broader category of information that requires safeguarding due to laws, regulations, or government-wide policies.

Secondly, the type of information that falls into each category is different. FCI is typically associated with a specific government contract or procurement process, while CUI can range from personal privacy information to law enforcement data.

Lastly, the handling requirements for each type of information are different. For example, while both types of information need to be protected, the specific security controls required for CUI are more extensive and specific than those for FCI. This is primarily because CUI includes more sensitive types of information that may require additional protections.

Government agencies and contractors must be aware of these differences to effectively manage the safeguarding and dissemination controls of each type of information.

In total, while Federal Contract Information and Controlled Unclassified Information may contain sensitive information that requires protection, they serve different purposes and have different handling requirements. Understanding these similarities and differences is crucial for government agencies and their contractors to ensure they are adequately protecting these types of information.

Consequences of FCI Breaches

In the contemporary digital landscape, the threat of data breaches and cyberattacks are increasingly persistent. This holds especially true for government agencies and their contractors, who are entrusted with safeguarding sensitive federal contract information. The breach of this information poses an enormous risk, opening the door to a multitude of potentially severe consequences, including penalties and reputational damage.

In the event of such breaches, government agencies could find themselves mired in legal trouble, as they may be held accountable for any lapses in data security. This could potentially lead to lawsuits filed by parties directly affected by the breach. Further, these agencies could also be slapped with considerable financial penalties, adding to their woes.

Contractors working with these agencies are not exempt from the fallout either. They could potentially face the termination of their contracts, which would result in significant business disruption and financial losses. They might also be subjected to heavy financial punishments for their failure to prevent the breach. Furthermore, their reputation could also suffer irreversible damage, greatly affecting their future prospects and business relationships.

Moreover, the consequences of a data breach extend well beyond the immediate parties involved. The wider public sentiment towards the government could also be negatively impacted. A significant breach could result in diminished trust in the government’s ability to protect citizen data, resulting in increased public fear and skepticism. This could potentially alter the public’s interaction with government agencies, and their willingness to share vital information.

Federal Government’s Role in Protecting FCI

The federal government plays a crucial role in ensuring the safekeeping of FCI. The government has outlined strict federal laws and regulations like the Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA) and the FAR. These laws require government agencies and contractors to implement robust security programs to safeguard the FCI. It is obligatory for these entities to follow the specified protocols to prevent any unauthorized access, disclosure, or misuse of FCI.

Moreover, the federal government, specifically the Department of Defense (DoD), has introduced the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) framework. This model requires all DoD contractors to obtain third-party certification to assure they are fully equipped to protect FCI and validate that they meet the specific cybersecurity practices and maturity levels.

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) also plays a significant part in ensuring FCI protection. It acts as a watchdog, conducting audits and reviews on the efficiency and effectiveness of federal programs safeguarding FCI. Any identified discrepancies or weaknesses are reported, and recommendations made for improvements.

Ultimately, the safeguarding of FCI is a collective responsibility involving multiple government agencies. They enact laws, devise policies, conduct audits, and obligate third-party certification to ensure FCI remains protected at all times.

Government Contractors’ Role in Protecting FCI

Government contractors play a pivotal role in protecting FCI. One of their primary responsibilities is to implement effective cybersecurity measures, ensuring that all FCI stays protected against potential cyber threats. This includes the use of encryptions, firewalls, and secure networks. Contractors must adhere to the regulations established by the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), which sets additional minimum cybersecurity standards.

Moreover, contractors are obliged to conduct regular training and awareness programs for their employees. It ensures risks associated with handling FCI, like inadvertent disclosure or unauthorized access, are minimized. They are often mandated to develop and maintain an internal system that can identify, track, and protect FCI.

Additionally, contractors have to promptly report any suspected or actual breaches of FCI to the relevant government agencies. This not only helps in immediate damage control but also aids in improving the overall cybersecurity framework.

In summary, the role of government contractors in protecting FCI is substantial and multifaceted. Their responsibilities range from implementing robust cybersecurity measures, training employees, maintaining a secure internal system, and making prompt and accurate reports of any breaches. The safety of FCI depends largely on the sincere efforts and due diligence of these contractors.

Government Regulations in Place to Ensure FCI Protection

Given the sensitive nature of FCI, it’s imperative to have protective measures in place to prevent unauthorized access and use.

One of the main regulations ensuring the protection of FCI is the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC). This is a certification procedure developed by the Department of Defense (DoD) to enhance the protection of FCI within the Defense Industrial Base (Defense Industrial Base). CMMC demands all DoD contractors, regardless of size or the nature of their work, to be certified. The level of certification required is based on the amount and sensitivity of the FCI handled by the contractor.

Another key regulation is the Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA), which mandates that government agencies and contractors implement robust cybersecurity measures to safeguard FCI. These measures include periodic risk assessments, development of security procedures, and regular evaluation of the effectiveness of the implemented security measures.

Additionally, the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) establishes mandatory cybersecurity requirements for DoD contractors. Under DFARS, contractors must provide “adequate security” to protect FCI, which includes access control, incident response, and risk assessment, among others.

In summary, regulations like CMMC, FISMA, and DFARS play a pivotal role in dictating the protection of FCI. These regulations uphold stringent requirements, ensuring government agencies and contractors implement comprehensive and effective measures to secure FCI.

Best Practices for Protecting Federal Contract Information (FCI)

Safeguarding Federal Contract Information (FCI) is of paramount importance due to its critical nature and the potential ramifications of a security breach. The proper handling and sharing of FCI are crucial in order to ensure its confidentiality and the integrity of the associated systems. There are several recognized best practices that can be followed to facilitate this process.

Firstly, one of the fundamental best practices is access control. This refers to the principle that only those personnel who are specifically authorized should have any access to FCI. Establishing and maintaining strict access controls is an essential element of this. This may involve using secure systems and platforms that are designed with high levels of security and privacy in mind. In addition, audit logs should be reviewed and analyzed regularly. This means monitoring and tracking all instances of data access – who accesses what, when they accessed it, and what changes, if any, were made. This will help to quickly identify any unauthorized access or unusual activity.

Data encryption is another critical best practice. This process transforms the information into a format that is unreadable without a decryption key, which ensures that even if a security breach occurs, the data will remain secure. The information would be absolutely incomprehensible to anyone who is not authorized to access it.

Thirdly, it is of paramount importance to instill a culture of Training and Awareness within the organization. Employees, at all levels, should be regularly trained and made aware of the importance of protecting FCI. This may include education on the potential risks, the best practices for safeguarding FCI, and the repercussions of any breaches. This kind of security awareness training can promote a proactive approach to data protection within the organization.

Regular System Updates is another key measure in defending FCI. The security of the systems that are used to store and handle FCI should be updated on a regular basis. Cybersecurity threats are constantly evolving, and as new threats emerge, the systems need to be updated in order to maintain a robust level of protection.

Through the effective implementation of these and other pertinent measures, the risk of a data breach can be drastically mitigated. By adhering to these best practices, the integrity of FCI can be ensured, and its protection can be upheld.

Maintaining Confidentiality of FCI

Government agencies and contractors must actively work together to safeguard FCI. One way to achieve this is through comprehensive data handling policies. These policies should involve clear guidelines on data access, storage, transmission, and disposal. Agencies and contractors should only allow accredited individuals to access FCI and should always store it in secure, encrypted formats.

Additionally, both parties should engage in regular audits to ensure compliance with these data handling policies. These audits also serve to monitor for any potential breaches or vulnerabilities in the system. Staff trainings should be held frequently to make sure everyone is updated with the best practices when dealing with FCI.

Lastly, any sharing of FCI between agencies and contractors should be tightly controlled and monitored. Any exchange needs to be done over secure channels, with all FCI appropriately encrypted. Furthermore, procedures should be in place to verify the authenticity of the receiving party before any FCI is transmitted.

Maintaining the confidentiality of FCI requires a proactive, ongoing effort from both government agencies and their contractors. Through stringent data handling policies, regular audits and staff training, and secure communication channels, FCI can be effectively protected.

Kiteworks Helps Government Agencies and Contractors Protect FCI With a Private Content Network

It’s crucial to regard Federal Contract Information (FCI) as a high-priority asset within government functions, carrying significant weight in decision-making and operational processes. Considering the sensitive nature of this data, with potential implications on national security and economic equilibrium, its protection should be an utmost priority. The potential aftermath of a breach, including possible lawsuits, financial repercussions, and a damaged public image, underscores this need. It is therefore imperative for government entities and contractors to enforce robust data safeguarding measures. Essential protective strategies should encompass access control, data encryption, consistent training and system updates. Regular assessments of these strategies are also essential to ensure their effectiveness and government regulatory adherence. With an accurate grasp and application of these protective practices, we can uphold the integrity of FCI and consequently preserve public welfare.

The Kiteworks Private Content Network, a FIPS 140-2 Level validated secure file sharing and file transfer platform, consolidates email, file sharing, web forms, SFTP and managed file transfer, so organizations control, protect, and track every file as it enters and exits the organization.

Kiteworks supports nearly 90% of CMMC 2.0 Level 2 requirements out of the box. As a result, DoD contractors and subcontractors can accelerate their CMMC 2.0 Level 2 accreditation process by ensuring they have the right sensitive content communications platform in place.

With Kiteworks, DoD contractors and subcontractors unify their sensitive content communications into a dedicated Private Content Network, leveraging automated policy controls and tracking and cybersecurity protocols that align with CMMC 2.0 practices.

Kiteworks enables rapid CMMC 2.0 compliance with core capabilities and features including:

  • Certification with key U.S. government compliance standards and requirements, including SSAE-16/SOC 2, NIST SP 800-171, and NIST SP 800-172
  • FIPS 140-2 Level 1 validation
  • FedRAMP Authorized for Moderate Impact Level CUI
  • AES 256-bit encryption for data at rest, TLS 1.2 for data in transit, and sole encryption key ownership

Kiteworks deployment options include on-premises, hosted, private, hybrid, and FedRAMP virtual private cloud. With Kiteworks: control access to sensitive content; protect it when it’s shared externally using automated end-to-end encryption, multi-factor authentication, and security infrastructure integrations; see, track, and report all file activity, namely who sends what to whom, when, and how. Finally demonstrate compliance with regulations and standards like GDPR, ANSSI, HIPAA, CMMC, Cyber Essentials Plus, IRAP, DPA, and many more.

To learn more about Kiteworks, schedule a custom demo today.


Back to Risk & Compliance Glossary

Get started.

It’s easy to start ensuring regulatory compliance and effectively managing risk with Kiteworks. Join the thousands of organizations who feel confident in their content communications platform today. Select an option below.


Avec Kiteworks, se mettre en conformité règlementaire et bien gérer les risques devient un jeu d’enfant. Rejoignez dès maintenant les milliers de professionnels qui ont confiance en leur plateforme de communication de contenu. Cliquez sur une des options ci-dessous.

Jetzt loslegen.

Mit Kiteworks ist es einfach, die Einhaltung von Vorschriften zu gewährleisten und Risiken effektiv zu managen. Schließen Sie sich den Tausenden von Unternehmen an, die sich schon heute auf ihre Content-Kommunikationsplattform verlassen können. Wählen Sie unten eine Option.

Get A Demo