Home > Security and Compliance Blog > CMMC Compliance > 7 Essential Security Features to Block Unauthorized Access to CUI in 2026

7 Essential Security Features to Block Unauthorized Access to CUI in 2026

by Danielle Barbour updated February 23, 2026 CMMC Compliance

Reading Time: 7 minutes

Protecting Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) in 2026 demands a layered stack that prevents, detects, and proves control across every channel where CUI moves. Executive Order 13556 established CUI as a category requiring protection, and NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 3 outlines controls nonfederal systems must implement—especially access control, encryption, and continuous monitoring (NIST SP 800-171r3).

The core security features that block unauthorized access include a Private Data Network to govern file and message flows; DLP; IAM with Zero Trust; EDR; XDR/SIEM; NDR; and CSPM/SASE—underpinned by disciplined asset discovery and vulnerability scanning.

Table of Contents

This guide explains how each security feature works and how to combine them for measurable CUI risk reduction.

Executive Summary

Main idea: Protecting CUI in 2026 requires a unified, layered approach that prevents, detects, and proves control across identity, endpoints, network, cloud, and governed file/email workflows—aligned to NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 3.

Why you should care: The right security features reduce breach risk, simplify audits, and curb tool sprawl. They provide measurable control over CUI across every channel where it moves, helping you meet regulatory obligations while maintaining productivity.

Key Takeaways

Layered security features stop unauthorized CUI access. Combine IAM with Zero Trust, DLP, EDR, XDR/SIEM, NDR, and CSPM/SASE to prevent, detect, and verify control across users, devices, networks, and cloud.
Prioritize identity first. Adaptive MFA, least-privilege access, and rapid deprovisioning block credential misuse and align access to CUI handling policies.
Unify detection with XDR/SIEM plus NDR. Consolidated telemetry accelerates triage, exposes lateral movement, and produces audit-ready evidence linked to specific CUI assets.
Operationalize DLP across email, endpoints, and cloud. Precise detection and channel-wide enforcement prevent accidental leaks and malicious exfiltration without derailing collaboration.
Govern workflows with a Private Data Network. Centralized policy, encryption, and immutable logging create a single chain of custody across file, email, and form exchanges.

1. Data Loss Prevention for CUI Protection

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) security features prevent unauthorized data exposure and monitor sensitive information using methods like content-aware inspection and document fingerprinting (top cybersecurity tools overview). For CUI, DLP must operate across email, endpoints, and cloud services to stop accidental leaks and malicious exfiltration.

What to require:

Precise detection: Document fingerprinting, exact data match (EDM), and fuzzy matching tuned to CUI schemas and document types.
Channel coverage: Inline email inspection, endpoint agents for removable media/print, and cloud integrations for M365, Google Workspace, SharePoint/OneDrive, and major EFSS.
Policy agility: Quarantine, redact, encrypt, coach, or block—with automated exceptions for mission-critical flows that remain fully auditable.
Seamless integration: Tie DLP to IAM, ticketing, and SIEM to enforce least privilege and capture evidence.

DLP use cases for CUI

Use case	Typical controls	CUI examples managed
Email monitoring	Content-aware rules, EDM, quarantine/justification workflows	Drawings, contract line-item data
Cloud storage enforcement	Sharing restrictions, external collaborator controls, watermark/expiry	Export-controlled specs, supplier deliverables
Endpoint & removable media	Device control, print restrictions, local encryption	Field maintenance manuals, SCADA configs
End-user file tracking	Watermarks, file beacons, remote revoke	Drafts shared for review/approvals

2. Identity and Access Management with Zero Trust

Identity and Access Management (IAM) centralizes user authentication, controls permissions based on roles, and supports adaptive multi-factor authentication (MFA) to prevent credential misuse (expert IAM guidance). A Zero Trust approach verifies every request—no implicit trust based on network location—and enforces least privilege using roles and attributes (ABAC) with context signals like device posture and geolocation.

A practical deployment flow:

Identity proofing and federation with authoritative sources
Role and attribute assignment aligned to CUI handling policies
Policy enforcement via conditional access and just-in-time privilege
Periodic access reviews with attestation and automated revocation
Rapid deprovisioning and key revocation on role change or exit

Pair IAM with strong session management, adaptive MFA for risky contexts, and privileged access workflows. Routine access reviews and immediate offboarding are decisive to preventing unauthorized CUI access.

3. Endpoint Detection and Response Capabilities

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) delivers continuous endpoint telemetry, behavioral analytics, and automated containment that stop hands-on-keyboard intrusions and ransomware before CUI is touched. In 2026, low-footprint, cloud-delivered, single-agent designs reduce operational overhead while boosting detection fidelity.

Key features to compare:

Behavior-led analytics and rapid scan times that minimize user impact
AI/ML-driven detection and memory forensics to flag fileless techniques
Remote administration: network isolation, scriptless remediation, rollback
Resource usage and OS coverage across servers, workstations, and VDI

Summary considerations:

Deployment: agent coverage, change control, and third-party software conflicts
Real-time telemetry: depth of process, network, identity, and kernel events
Compliance: exportable evidence, audit-friendly timelines, and custody-preserving artifacts

4. Extended Detection and Response with SIEM Integration

XDR aggregates telemetry from endpoints, network, email, identity, and cloud for unified detection and response. SIEM platforms collect, correlate, and analyze security data across the IT estate, now increasingly cloud-native and AI-driven for faster anomaly detection (AI-driven detection trends). For CUI programs, prioritize XDR/SIEM integration to eliminate alert silos, accelerate incident triage, and streamline evidence collection for audits.

Event source coverage to target

Event source	Examples of signals	Why it matters for CUI
Endpoints	Process trees, module loads, script execution	Detects credential theft and CUI staging on devices
Cloud	API calls, config changes, token usage	Flags misconfigurations and risky automations
Email	Phish detections, DLP triggers, link clicks	Blocks exfil and BEC paths to CUI repositories
Network	DNS/NetFlow/PCAP anomalies, data spikes	Spots lateral movement and covert exfil channels
Identity	MFA prompts, geo/behavior anomalies, privilege	Surfaces account takeover and policy drift

Integrate Kiteworks event logs so file, email, and form-level actions appear alongside XDR/SIEM alerts—closing the loop from detection to precise CUI asset impact and remediation.

5. Network Detection and Behavioral Monitoring

Network Detection and Response (NDR) detects threats using deep packet inspection, NetFlow analysis, and machine learning-based anomaly analytics. It excels at early detection of lateral movement, insider misuse, and supply chain-driven anomalies that bypass endpoints or originate from unmanaged/IoT systems.

Deploy NDR with XDR/SIEM for:

Visibility into east-west traffic where CUI often traverses internal services
Detection of data hoarding or abnormal transfer patterns from CUI stores
Continuous device profiling that exposes shadow IT and rogue services

Behavioral monitoring examples:

Sudden, high-volume access to CUI shares outside business hours
Unauthorized access attempts from atypical subnets or geos
Protocol misuse (e.g., DNS tunneling) or unusual encryption profiles
New or rare device identities communicating with CUI repositories

Insider risk programs should pair behavioral analytics with coaching and escalation; many CUI violations are unintentional and best handled with progressive controls (insider risk approaches).

6. Cloud Security Posture Management and SASE

Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) finds misconfigurations in cloud environments—such as public storage or excessive IAM privileges—and enables remediation workflows. It brings continuous configuration scanning, risk scoring, and automated fixes across SaaS and IaaS platforms that host CUI. Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) complements CSPM by enforcing identity-based access, data controls, and threat defenses for distributed users and apps.

Common CUI cloud risks and how CSPM/SASE addresses them

Cloud risk	How CSPM mitigates	How SASE mitigates
Public object storage/buckets	Detects and remediates public ACLs	Blocks unsanctioned uploads; inspects data-in-motion
Excessive IAM roles/permissions	Flags toxic combinations; rightsizes roles	Enforces conditional access and ZTNA
Unmanaged SaaS file sharing	Discovers shadow apps; applies guardrails	CASB mode controls sharing and token usage
Misconfigured logging/auditing	Ensures audit log retention and coverage	Routes telemetry to SIEM; protects log integrity
Unencrypted data stores	Verifies encryption at rest/in transit	Enforces TLS and controls egress paths

For regulated workloads, align cloud choices and controls with authorizations like FedRAMP when feasible to reduce assessment friction (FedRAMP CUI storage considerations).

7. Asset Discovery and Vulnerability Scanning

You cannot protect CUI you can’t see. Asset discovery security features enumerate active hosts, open ports, and services—establishing the map on which CUI resides so you can apply precise access controls and monitoring. Vulnerability scanning, including web application assessments aligned to the OWASP Top Ten, should run continuously and feed remediation and incident playbooks with timestamped evidence.

Federal guidance underscores that nonfederal systems must implement ongoing risk management and monitoring to protect CUI, including inventory, configuration management, and scanning with documented processes (GSA CUI protection process). Embed scans in CI/CD, validate compensating controls, and preserve reports within your audit trail.

Kiteworks Private Data Network for Secure CUI Management

The Kiteworks Private Data Network centralizes governance of CUI across file transfer, email, web forms, APIs, and SFTP—enforcing a single chain of custody with immutable, event-level audit logs. By unifying encryption, zero trust access, and granular policy across every CUI workflow, organizations replace scattered point tools with one platform that consistently applies controls, proves compliance, and minimizes operational complexity.

Unified compliance posture: Map controls to NIST 800-171 compliance and CMMC Level 2 across data-in-motion and data-at-rest, with reporting that accelerates assessments and POA&Ms. See how this simplifies audits in our overview of CUI protection controls (Kiteworks CMMC 2 CUI Protection).
End-to-end control: Granular policies spanning SafeVIEW (secure viewing with watermarking, expiry, and location/device controls) and SafeEDIT (controlled coauthoring with version provenance), plus secure email and web form submission that preserve encryption and identity verification.
Zero trust access: Attribute-, role-, and context-aware policies; adaptive MFA; approval workflows; and rapid deprovisioning that align with least-privilege principles.
Ecosystem integration: Connect identity providers (IdPs), DLP, and SIEM/XDR for closed-loop enforcement and evidence. The U.S. Department of Transportation’s Inspector General found tool sprawl and disjointed visibility undermine continuous monitoring—consolidation and integration are paramount (DOT OIG continuous monitoring findings).

For advanced CUI enclaves, the Kiteworks approach complements domain-separated architectures and hardware-based protections. Cross-domain solutions control content flow between security domains with guards and data labeling (cross-domain solution basics), while confidential computing isolates data-in-use within trusted execution environments for tamper-resistant processing (confidential computing overview).

To learn more about CUI protection and demonstrating CMMC 2.0 compliance, schedule a custom demo today.

Frequently Asked Questions

Start by hardening identity with Zero Trust IAM and adaptive MFA so every request is verified and high-risk sessions are stepped up. In parallel, deploy DLP to email and cloud file sharing to stop accidental leaks and exfiltration, and roll out EDR for rapid containment on endpoints. These controls can be implemented quickly, deliver immediate visibility, and measurably reduce unauthorized CUI access while you integrate telemetry into SIEM/XDR and mature reviews, deprovisioning, and response playbooks.

Yes. XDR normalizes signals across endpoints, identity, email, cloud, and network to detect multi-stage attacks and orchestrate response. SIEM centralizes long-term log collection, correlation, and compliance evidence with flexible retention and reporting. Together, they eliminate alert silos, accelerate triage, and map incidents to specific CUI assets and users. Integrating a Private Data Network and other repositories ensures file, email, and form actions appear alongside detections, enabling precise remediation, root-cause analysis, and audit-ready timelines that prove chain of custody.

By centralizing governance of file, email, form, API, and SFTP workflows under one policy, encryption, and identity fabric with immutable audit logs. A Private Data Network enforces consistent controls, reduces reliance on scattered point tools, and preserves chain of custody across data-in-motion and data-at-rest. Integration with IdPs, DLP, and SIEM/XDR closes the loop for prevention, detection, and evidence, simplifying assessments, POA&Ms, and continuous monitoring without sacrificing productivity across complex, distributed CUI programs at enterprise scale.

Demand precise detection (document fingerprinting, exact data match, and tuned classifiers), broad channel coverage (email, endpoints, and major SaaS/EFSS), and policy agility (quarantine, redact, encrypt, coach, or block with auditable exceptions). Tight integration with IAM, ticketing, and SIEM ensures enforcement aligns to least privilege and generates evidence. Add watermarks, expiry, remote revoke, and removable media controls to curb insider mistakes and malicious exfiltration without stifling collaboration workflows required for mission delivery and regulated partner exchange.

No. Traditional VPNs implicitly trust network location and extend broad access once connected, creating excessive lateral movement risk. Replace or augment with Zero Trust Network Access that continuously verifies identity, device posture, geolocation, and context, applying least-privilege authorization to specific apps and data flows. Pair ZTNA with adaptive MFA, strong session management, and conditional policies, and monitor with DLP, EDR, and SIEM/XDR to prevent, detect, and prove control over CUI wherever users work and collaborate.

Additional Resources